GOVERNMENT REGULATORS MAY HAVE BEEN MANIPULATED TO KEEP EVIDENCE OF MASS POLLUTION HIDDEN 13 November 2003 Salon.com is reporting that a coal slurry spill in Inez, Kentucky has been hidden from public view by the government's investigative process. The report suggests the Environmental Protection Agency was used as a filter for the investigative process, to ensure key facts would not come to light. According to Salon.com: "The EPA called the Inez spill the worst environmental catastrophe in the history of the Eastern United States. Far more extensive in damage than the widely known 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill off the coast of Alaska, the Martin County Coal slurry spill dumped an estimated 306 million gallons of toxic sludge down 100 miles of waterways." An investigator who has attempted to learn why the spill happened and how to prevent it has reportedly been obstructed by his superiors, and is now facing dismissal, for exercising his intellectual initiative as superintendent of the National Mine Safety and Health Academy. While it is not clear to what extent political appointees at high levels may have had a role in influencing policy, it does appear that a clear departure from standard regulatory practices occurred, allowing the massive toxic runoff to be kept from entering into the public's awareness. [s] BACKGROUND: The New York Times today featured a front page account of new rules changes at the Environmental Protection Agency. The rules changes, in line with current administration energy policies, will effectively end investigations into Clean Air Act violations at 50 power plants across the United States. The reported rules change would allow energy producers and refineries to upgrade their plants, even where it increases harmful emissions, without installing any pollution controls at all. The Times also reports that a "career E.P.A. enforcement lawyer" said the move was unprecedented and characterized the process as a decision "not to enforce the law at all." [Full Story] |
|||||||
|